• mavu@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      the middle click is “paste selection” not “paste clipboard”. those are 2 different things under *nix.

      I personally use this constantly because you need the funtionality to quickly copy some text somewhere so often, it makes much more sense to not have to do: Select text, ctrl-c, move mouse, click text field, ctrl-v. much nicer to just: select text, move mouse, press middle button.

  • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    7 days ago

    Middle click paste sucks, I keep accideE&4nry!NAnY6Yfntally activating it in the middle of my documents which is bad when I have st6SFMzZkTR7!b^yuff like passwords copied and don’t notice, so good

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      KDE and Gnome already have toggles for it, though Gnome’s is in gnome-tweaks because Gnome hates exposed settings.

      I’d support unifying behavior between toolkits and apps to provide users with a single point to set their preference, but I use this feature a hundred times a day. I’d also like it to remain the default; *nix desktops should have their own flavor instead of just copying Mac OS or Windows, and middle-click paste has been a part of that flavor for 40 years.

  • luluberlue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 days ago

    Damn, the amount of comments that didn’t even read the full… title… Is reading comprehension getting this bad? Middle clic paste isn’t getting removed, just being opt-in rather than opt-out, yet a bunch of commenters are up in arms “time to ditch firefox”…

    • doodoo_wizard@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Historically speaking, the gnome devs have made “disabled by default” the first step towards removing a feature everyone uses.

      • luluberlue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Historically speaking, from what I’m reading is that gnome devs have a history of bad decisions birthing forks here and there “fine, I’ll do my own gnome, with blackjack and hookers” too, so I don’t know how much weigh such a decision can have to be perfectly honnest.

        • doodoo_wizard@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Eh, gnome is the default on some of the biggest distributions in a time when apparently lots of people are trying Linux for the first time so there’s an outsized opportunity for their usual shenanigans to have consequences for the rest of us.

          Which has happened a bunch of times in the past.

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Half of them probably will. People are like that.

      Many times, I have seen people switch tech because something is missing or has changed…and they switch to something that also does not have it. Boggles my mind.

      • Jeff Van Gundy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        On the other hand, the alternative they switch to may have other features that they like. If a particular option was what kept them using some program/DE/OS, why stay if it’s gone?

  • LukaszH@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    For me it’his is one of the most useful features of Linux desktops and one of the main reasons I feel lost when I have to use Windows.

      • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        And soon new users will never know, as each great Linux feature becomes hidden until the default desktop is a awful as all the rest.

        • eta@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’ve used Linux for five years now and always wondered who had the idea to put paste on the middle mouse button and thought it was just some obscure convention from the past since it didn’t even paste what was in my clipboard. I never figured out that it was a different kind of paste where you just select text since it is never explained anywhere. I’d rather have new users not be put off by strange unexplained behavior.

          • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Strange and unexpected?

            When it doesn’t that is strange and unexpected. It’s relative.

            This has been the Unix standard for 30 years implemented at MIT if I remember right.

            Maybe a first use, explain, ask toggle. Instead of having to opt in.

            They keep ruining Linux by dumbing it down!

            Next thing you know we will be catering to mac users and all mouse buttons will do nothing.

        • luluberlue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          As much as new windows users don’t know about ctrl+c, alt+f4, win+d… Those who don’t care won’t learn, those who do, will, it’s as simple as that.

          • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            They won’t though, because they will never know.

            I am not a fan of dumbing everything down and hiding all the good stuff.

            • luluberlue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              Is there a big popup at startup with windows that I somehow missed with all the shortcuts? Or did linux became sudenly less documented overnight? Why wouldn’t they know? Why do you think that users magicaly knows about shortcuts almost never referenced anywhere on windows but wouldn’t know about one sparking a debate among linux users with a toggle in settings directly referencing it?

  • nyan@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s one of those things you either use constantly or not at all. Activating the feature intentionally and having it fail is irritating, but activating it unintentionally because you didn’t know it was there could have serious consequences. I mean, I can even come up with cases where the wrong information being C&P’d accidentally into the wrong Web form could result in someone ending up dead.

    Given the difference in stakes, “off by default” makes sense for this feature. I wouldn’t call it a dumpster fire, though—more like a relic of a more innocent time.

  • eta@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    TIL why that exists and how it works after using Linux for five years. I always wondered why someone put a function like pasting but not also copying text on the mouse and never realised you just have to select it since apparently there is a second clipboard. I wouldn’t miss it but it also wasn’t that big of a problem.

  • underscores@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I’m just lost why it’s so hard baked into x11 instead of configurable. I don’t want middle click to paste my selections. Yes I know x11 has some history and that it’s a feature, I do not like that feature. I will never like that feature. I want to copy manually and paste manually.

    I don’t want my selections to be captured in a buffer.

  • Xylight@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    As a newgen (derogatory), Id appreciate this. Middle click has always been auto-scroll to me and it takes a good search to figure out how to disable it on a new installation.

  • TruePe4rl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I am used to using middle mouse button to move canvas in both Krita and Inkscape. I know that it would be a silly default to just use it for movement, but countless missclicks in LibreOffice are reason good enough to be at least ocassionally frustrated over the default.

  • mavu@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    Yes, please. Lets dumb down userinterfaces more. I think the right mouse button should go away next, people can’t rightclick on touchscreens anyway, and many are confused by the extra button.

    /s. so many /s. thank good it’s open source, if they ever remove the setting to turn it back on, i can just put the code back in.

  • DiabeticNomad@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    Didn’t know if it was possible for open source to disappoint me, but here we are. Instead of removing it entirely make it an option so the people can decide.

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Sure but youre probably aware that the vast majority of users dont, and for those users its a usability issue.

      • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        If you’re referring to touch screen users, then I don’t see how not having copy/pasting work when you plug in a mouse benefits them normally when they don’t have mice plugged in.

    • Cris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      7 days ago

      From the other thread it seems it’ll just be disabled by default, and enableable if wanted

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 days ago

      Same, and I have done so since the mid-90’s. It’s muscle memory at this point.

      • mybuttnolie@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        never even knew that was a thing until a couple months ago, found it by accident. for 15-ish years I’ve just used a programmable mouse button for paste. still don’t know what i should do with that button now since middle click can paste.

      • Cris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        From the other thread it seems it’ll just be disabled by default, and enableable if wanted

        • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yeah, the title of this post seems to make that fairly clear. Still annoying though.

          • vandsjov@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Maybe GNOME and Mozilla will consider a separate download/package where it is enabled by default, like gnome-desktop-middle-click-to-paste-enabled :D