• Marn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I wouldn’t call my self a fan of Huang, but this smells like blackmail especially with the air time it’s getting. A billionaire sleeping around is literally not news. I wonder what he didn’t want to do to make the shareholders want to replace him

    • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Well it was a Chinese Spy he slept with, allegedly. So this is not just an affair affecting his personal life.

    • ryannathans@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Billionaires sleeping around, even with consent, is enough to sink them as CEO. It’s happened to big companies in Australia. It’s news for short sellers and a great lever to pry open the dramas of their personal lives and get people talking in private interviews. Especially if there’s a court case, discovery can be spicy

  • Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I cannot imagine the next CEO being an improvement for gamers, feels very likely they’re just gonna go all in on datacenter

    • Agent_Karyo@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      They will almost certainly be worse, that being said Huang is your typical American oligarch, so it doesn’t really matter.

      • tempest@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        They’re all terrible, it’s fully a requirement of being a C level. You cannot be a C*O and be a good person in a publicly traded company. You’re required to maximize profits at all costs, the removes the ability for them to be good.

        • Agent_Karyo@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          You’re required to maximize profits at all costs,

          I would actually disagree. There is also broader requirements around maintaining the oligarchic regime and helping keeping commoners in line. The exact implementation reflects local cultural preferences, but that’s true of all oligarchic regimes.

          • dom@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Im of the belief that what you describe is a byproduct of the first point, more so than the explicit goal itself. Outside of some exceptions

    • Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Weren’t they already as “all-in” as one can possibly be? Surely there’s no way to double-down on that, there’s just no room in the scale left to move to.

  • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    7 hours ago

    But on the other hand, he managed to extricate himself before the bubble he’s largely responsible for pops and the lawmakers belatedly starts looking for someone to blame for the inevitable economic disaster.

    • absquatulate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I wonder if this whole scandal wasn’t actually a lifeboat negociated with the trump people right before nvidia sinks

      • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Given the economic losses incurred by nVidia and with more to come from cumulative awarded damages in all the investor lawsuits that are mounting, I doubt this would be their preferred kind of out. It’s more likely just a personal silver lining for Jensen.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    How is this man’s name pronounced? Is it “wong” or “who-ong”, maybe some third thing?