• byungyoonc@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    So true. “You cannot escape AI” is simply not true as there are many FOSS projects explicitly banning usage of LLMs. By thinking this way you just give up to even trying fighting against it. This is such a defeatist logic and harmful to FOSS ecosystem in general.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Good luck running any of those FOSS projects when all operating systems are made using LLM code these days. Linus Torvalds explicitly allows such code.

      • byungyoonc@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        NetBSD, RedoxOS and some explicitly declines LLM contributions, while both not using Linux as a kernel for their operating system! I do know there are fewer and fewer ground to stand but at least we can try.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          59 minutes ago

          NetBSD, RedoxOS and some explicitly declines LLM contributions

          rustc permits LLM code. LLVM/clang permits LLM code. GCC permits LLM use if the code itself is not LLM generated.

          Yeah, good luck actually getting to run these OSes when all compilers allow LLMs in some for or another.

          Edit: Mesa also allows LLM contributions. Try any usable graphics output without Mesa.