• addie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    When my Tuxedo Pulse arrived, I turned it on once to marvel at the fact that it started up straight into Linux. Then restarted it to install Arch btw and never looked back. Fantastic laptop, tho.

  • BananaTrifleViolin@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Moving away from Ubuntu makes absolute sense from what they describe.

    I do wonder though, is basing a distro on Debian Testing a good idea? I understand them not wanting to go to the Debian stable as they already have issues with big drift for the cutting edge tools they want to ship breaking have the unintended consequences of breaking stable software. But Debian Testing will add in a constant shift in all the packages; they may be more recent but there is a much greater exposure to bugs.

    Tuxedo’s OS will itself become a testing ground for packages in a way it wasn’t before. They’re both moving away from Ubuntu AND moving away from a LTS base. Though I suppose they can always re-base to Debian Stable at it’s next big release if they do find it too cumbersome.

    Still, I wonder if this will happen with other distros. I know Mint has a Debian flavour which is seemingly described as a backup “plan B” in-case they felt the need to shift. I can also see the constant forcing of Snap into the ecosystem, and now the vague AI stuff that Tuxedo quote would also prompt a lot of distros to decide how dependent should they be on Ubuntu going forward.

  • endlessvoid@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Probably a good decision in the long run, their rational makes sense. Ubuntu’s stubborn insistence on snap is poor decision making on their part.

    I run Tuxedo as my daily driver and look forward to the more rolling release focused strategy.

    • frogzombie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Sucks it will take a fresh install, but the whole reason I switched from arch was stability with new feature parity.

  • Magister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Of course, this is why I’m using MX Linux, it’s Debian based. systemd optional, no snap, no flatpak, stable.

  • lemmysir@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Is Mint planning the same? I know they have their debian edition, but don’t remember of it was meant to become the main edition at some point.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It won’t happen any time soon unless Ubuntu does something drastic. I do think it would be a good idea for them to move in that direction, though.

    • tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I think it’s just a proof of concept in case they feel the need to switch the base. I didn’t head anything indicating that’s the case already