• PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    Even with a tiny OS and desktop, 2GB RAM is gonna fill up super fast. Modern websites are bloated af, there’s no browser in the world that can fix that

    • db2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Haiku would scream on that, but I’m not sure on the browser situation. On any OS any browser lately is a memory hog.

  • deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is an absolutely bottom of the barrel machine nowadays. You’ll be able to run Linux on it, but nothing is going to run “fast”. Especially not a webbrowser with modern websites.

    If you’re actually considering using this machine, the two most important upgrades you can make are SSD instead of HDD, and a bit more RAM (8GB if possible). With the ~2011-2012 CPU (judging by the release date of the iGPU listed) and the mentioned upgrades, you should have a usable (although slow) workstation for light tasks. Without the upgrades, be prepared to wait for things to load.

  • Fatur.New@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Disable javascript by using ublock origin. I also suggest using a lightweight UI like Xfce or LXQT and 32-bit Linux OS

    I am sorry if my english is bad

    • sneaky@r.nf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      After seeing it only has 2gb of RAM does it really matter? Guessing a Pentium of some kind…

    • IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because the hardware is obviously underspecced for any browser. I doubt they could even run a modern OS with a light DE. You’d need to already know what you’re doing if you willingly commit to specs this low.

      • nyan@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I doubt they could even run a modern OS with a light DE.

        They could, actually—it’s been about a year since I retired a machine with specs as bad or worse that ran Gentoo with TDE, and it was useful enough for many things. Web browsing was not one of those things, however.

      • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Hmm. So the assumption is then this is a troll post? Maybe the person doesn’t know and is new to this, got a free old laptop in example. You might be right that the system is underspecced for most normal usage and deeper knowledge to work with it might be required. But I don’t get why the person is downvoted for asking the question. Unless its a troll off course, if that is the assumption.

        • IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          When you add the fact that the main question contains emojis it destroys any bit of seriousness in the question. Emojis have their places but not when you want to be taken seriously. This post could not be a clearer example of a shitpost/troll post.

  • JTskulk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    links. I ran firefox on a 4G RAM laptop until recently and it was painful and always swapping.

    • FLD@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      have you tried Waterfox? it is much lighter and based on Firefox. I use this on my 4GB RAM laptop and it worked fine

      • JTskulk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I have a laptop from this century now (16G) and I like mainline firefox lol. Thanks though :)

  • FLD@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    try Waterfox, it is great for browsing the modern web on a low ram

    if it didn’t work, i guess you have to sacrifice some usability by using Falkon or any much lighter browsers (not much good for modern web browsing)

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    none. 15 year old apu, slow laptop hdd, 2gb ram (some consumed by the graphics). cpu performance of the earliest s939 dual core athlons.

    put a puppy or antix on it, i guess, and hope for the best. with the 8gb max and a small sata ssd it could run something more mainstream.

    update to add: i just reinstalled the latest antix-full over the top of my old one that runs on an old athlon dual core (am2+ 4gb and hdd). creeps a bit over 1gb ram used once you load a page up in firefox. it’ll be ‘usable’, i guess, running one thing at a time and not going crazy with open tabs and windows. still gonna go back on the recycle pile though. i have too many of this era desktop, no takers for them, and not enough room to store 'em.