• Alvaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    59 minutes ago

    I can run a gba emulator, an llm, a full os and a browser all at the same time with 4gb, so I think Windows is the compromise

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Wow. Not too transparent are they? RAM prices go up worldwide. Microsoft - “We need you to buy more RAM to successfully run are mostly unnecessary, bloated crap”.

  • KatherinaReichelt@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I have 32 GB RAM in my linux box. Not because I need it (I use 5,7GB currently), but because it was kind of cheap when I build the box. 16 GB or 32 GB were just a few Euros apart.

    But with the current RAM crisis? Holy crap, that is kind of a tone deaf statement

    • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      Im running Void on a 2013, dual core atom, netbook with 1800MB of ram, THAT is a compromise. No more than 4-5 tabs at a time, only one if I want to watch a video, but it works.

      16GB being the minimum for a desktop OS is insane.

      • JustAnotherPodunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        God damn I brought an old atom back to life with the leanest distro I could run just a month ago. 1gb ram. It is an absolute paperweight.

        The atom processors were garbage when they came out. I hate e waste as much as the next person but that’s a level of masochism I will not subject myself to. Pull the salvageables and refine the rest into a pawn shop puddle.

      • RedWeasel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I suspect part of it is modern web browsers and everything being online. That and “web apps” and such that take up WAY to much resources for what they do. In the name of security and justifiably so, each tab typically has it’s own thread/task which means more memory. They will free up as needed, but don’t do well always. With so many people just keeping tabs open rather than bookmarking them, users have also changed how they use their computers. So 16GB being a minimum and 32GB being recommended seems reasonable for a NEW computer. Remember, software is just going to need more resources in the future.

        Existing computers will be fine for a while longer, but will get to that “compromised” state eventually.

      • djdarren@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        My home server is a 2014 Mac mini with 8gb of soldered RAM. Even with that much, I can’t really use even LibreWolf if I want to stand any chance of the services I have installed having any RAM.

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Same here, but I put in 64GB because it was cheap. The only app I used (I don’t anymore) that would make use of that much was Photoshop, back when I was still a graphic designer. Even then, I didn’t need it, but it was nice to have.

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Microsoft just straight up admitting that they’re not optimising their OS anymore

  • Sculptus Poe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    121
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why should the OS itself, which is just supposed to facilitate the running of programs, use so much memory?

      • cybernihongo@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I run Debian on 6GBs. Before that, Windows 10 was close to unusable, but in all fairness I had it on an HDD while Debian is running off a by now two years old SSD.

      • Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        While Ubuntu recommends 6GB, it still uses much less than that even if you open Chrome lol

        If you enable zswap, you could probably live with 4GB

    • rozodru@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      it shouldn’t. the problem really boils down to devs for stuff that aren’t optimizing anything.

      For example I’m currently using a basic build Fedora 44 with Niri and a quickshell. I have 32gigs of ram on my current machine and at idle it uses just over 2gigs of memory. to me that’s too much. Niri uses about 160mb but quickshell/noctalia-shell uses about 400mb. too much. I need to stop using it.

      I use Foot as my terminal and that AT MOST will use 14mb of ram. that’s it. I point to Foot and say “that’s how things should be”.

      then adding something like a Browser and Discord into the mix and just forget about it. suddenly that 32gigs is being eaten alive. even today running a system on 16 is cutting it close because of the bullshit you need to run. I mean even a browser like Qutebrowser which SHOULD be light is going to eat ram because it’s running python and qtwebkit crap. And don’t get me started on Discord and ALL the various “we make discord better” apps that really don’t. vestkop, vencord, eqowhatever, doesn’t matter it’s all electron which treats your ram as an all you can eat buffet.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Right?! I have a debian NAS running openmediavault, it has music streaming and samba network shares. it only has 256MB RAM and doesn’t even use all that.

  • shweddy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    32gb is the new standard they need to run poorly optimized start menus and telemetry in the background while they think no one is paying attention

  • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    With 32 GB system RAM, Microsoft believes that the games can have more “breathing room”.

    There’s no such thing as “breathing room”, dammit. Once you set up 32 GB as standard, shitty / assumptive developers are going to say “well, we assooooome users have 32 GB. It would be a waste to design the game to use less than that lol lmao”. Specially devs doing the same as Microslop, and using AI shitty code to pump out code faster than humans can desloppify.

  • thatonecoder@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    In reality, if software used the native UI toolkits instead of Electron, even 12 GB could be reliably used for gaming, HEAVY gaming.

    • Bananskal@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Indeed. Now we’re starting up a whole new OS sandbox for every damn app. It’s ridiculous.