• fozid@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    My exact concern too. Don’t see it as an imminent problem, but would like some sort of succession plan or even to develop some sort of framework to ensure the kernel endures after Linus stops being involved.

      • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        What amazes me is, that a formal official plan (this) is just done recently a few months ago. How was there no official plan before? I don’t understand…

        • practisevoodoo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Have you got a will?
          Estimated 50% of adults don’t. There’s always a more pleasant task on the to-do list to be getting on with.

          • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            WTF we are talking about Linux, the biggest and most important piece of software. What are you even talking about will and adults? Sorry if this was meant to be a joke. But having a plan like this is crucial important.

            • practisevoodoo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              The point, is that people don’t like thinking about this subject, as evidenced by the fact that half of people don’t put plans in place even when it’s something as comparatively simple as a will unless they get more imminent prior warning. This is not a Linux kernel specific issue, Bram and vim being an obvious example. Something as potentially complicated as the Linux kernel succession? I can see why it wouldn’t be a subject the community was keen to tackle.