• jaselle@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    I feel kinda bad for the GZDoom dev, who immediately reverted his unpopular commit which contained only about 5 lines of placeholder AI-generated code. The backlash seemed really disproportionate. I imagine it’s a straw-broke-camel’s-back situation, as he apparently had unpopular opinions about default settings.

    • Agent_Karyo@piefed.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 days ago

      From reading some articles on this topic, the pushback against AI generated code was indeed a culmination broader issues with the management of GZDoom.

      It sounded like a fork would have happened sooner or later.

    • ampy@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      He was always disagreeing with everybody and getting into heated discussions so he didn’t have a great reputation to begin with. Also when people called him out for the AI code he went into a long rant. You can see how the conversation went online.

  • Venia Silente@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Not that I’m in favor of AIs but I don’t get the double standard. People fork GZDoom over a trivial commit made with AI, sure; but when it comes to RedHat lapping AI for their distros like it was that secretary on Bush’s bad end, no one seems to be doing a thing.