• Godort@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I mean, they’re not really wrong. Valve has a monopoly on game distribution the same way that Google has a monopoly on Internet search. Alternatives exist, but they aren’t really competing with Steam.

    Valve has so far been pretty pro-consumer which is how they got to where they are, but yhat doesn’t really change the fact that they essentially get to set the rules for digital distribution of games.

    • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It’s also a big risk, as they could always enshittify. It’s a good platform now, but if Gabe dies or decides to give up his leadership position, that could all change very quickly.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Yeah, the day Gabe leaves is going to be a sad day for gaming, because Steam is probably gonna get real shitty real quick. I’m sure some finance-minded jackasses will do their best to maximize short-term profit and fly the whole ecosystem into the ground at Mach 3.

        • Almacca@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          As long as it remains privately owned, it should be OK. The day shares go public, god forbid, will be the beginning of the end.

          • Kairos@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Thats not true. Privately owned firms tend to be really bad because they don’t have a feduciary duty to long term value. They suck everything dry. Private equity is the reason why daycare costs so much yet the daycare workers make minimum wage.

            Steam just happens to be fine under private ownership because it makes enough profit for Gabe to be satisfied.

    • jwiggler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Gamers have good reason to love Valve for Steam alone – not even accounting for their amazing games. They really do have the best gamer-oriented platform, and seemingly they care about gamers. I think they’ve done a lot to advance gaming on linux as well which is much appreciated.

      But, at least the way I see it, they still extract rents from game devs to an almost feudal degree.

      “Sure – come sell your grain game – but you’ll have to give me a third of your profit because I own the town square platform/servers.”

      Side note: It’s pretty funny that for a while Valve had Greek economist Yanis Varoufakis on staff to analyze spontaneously emerging markets for digital items on Steam – and he went on to write about the phenomenon above in his recent book Technofeudalism.

      Edit: formatting