• MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    They basically did a KSP port to Unity (i think?), slapped a vew graphical modpacks on it and called it a day, failing the promises of better performance, reactive world and giant part-counts. But i wouldn’t say it damaged the franchise but rather the (AAA) franchise damaged KSP.

    A few from the old team and some big modders are working now on KSA as a replacement, though there’s not much news yet.

    • stephen01king@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 days ago

      The team that did the porting had no access to the original dev team, and the performance is worse than KSP1, so I’d say its pretty bad.

      • eRac@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 days ago

        Not only did they not have access to the original team, the studio demanded absolute secrecy. Potential employees were not told anything about the project until after they were hired.

        The game required highly specialized skills to make and they made sure the studio wouldn’t be able to acquire those skills.

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 days ago

      Also ksp2 didn’t have half the features ksp1 had. So much was missing from the game that it made no sense to play it over ksp1.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 days ago

      KSP was already in Unity, think they moved to Unreal? It also wasn’t even a 1:1 port as it was missing a lot of features. More like a port of the early beta of KSP1.