So hold on they prioritize profit over quality, but the result isn’t “low quality”?

I mean, charitably I could separate design quality from technical quality and accept you were only talking about the latter, but it’s a big concession.

“Needs to die” and “needs to change” are very different things, and we’re all estabilishing that there is a lot of worthwhile stuff coming out of that side of the industry right now. If you think you’re being misunderstood I’d happily hear what the correct interpretation is supposed to be, but I’m going to politely say maybe it’s because you presented your point in an imprecise, hyperbolic way for effect, not because we’re twisting what you said.