Are you sure? What work did AI steal from? How is an artist being “gatekept”? What does the amalgamation of disparate terms even mean? Who is handing out recognition? Why can’t the artists who kept a gate have any?
The sentence answered no questions, but raised many.
What about all the artists who were gatekept from being given recognition for their work that the AIs stole from?
Copyright and intellectual property will eventually bring the whole thing down. We aren’t near there yet though.
Or the teachers who done teached to giving run on clauses in sentences which are used to form the basis of our point in writing the sentence for.
Their sentence made perfect sense and wasn’t a run-on. I’m sorry you read at a third grade level but I just wanted you to know you are wrong.
Are you sure? What work did AI steal from? How is an artist being “gatekept”? What does the amalgamation of disparate terms even mean? Who is handing out recognition? Why can’t the artists who kept a gate have any?
The sentence answered no questions, but raised many.
You take the marketing of “intelligence” and “learning” far too literally if you think those two concepts are in any way the same.
Clearly not one of your teachers.