Qmail was fast. Exim is plenty fast. Like how fast does it need to be? I admire the ambition but make Linux faster, o something.
I would like to see someone compare it against On-Prem Exchange, for no reason other then it’s stupid to compare.
Mozilla’s Thundermail email service uses Stalwart.
That’s true I use L̴̩̱̼̼̹͙̜͚̗̬̅̓́̊̚͜͜͝ì̷̛̫͖̮̩̃͐͋͘a̶̛̦͍̣̺̱͉̖͈̣̞̯̲͊̐̑̄̅̈̓̒̓͊͜͝͝ͅm̶̠͉̈̽̚͜e̵̩̯͒͘ and it is faster
Here’s their AI policy: https://support.stalw.art/t/how-we-use-ai-at-stalwart/1496
And there is a last reason, which is less rigorous but matters to us just as much. We write software because we enjoy writing software […] We are not interested in optimizing away the reason we do this.
Holy fucking shit. I read the whole thing and I even enjoyed reading it. This has to be the most sane shit I’ve read all month. This is THE definition of “how to use a tool”. I freaking love it.
Definitely agree on that part, if only the tools themselves weren’t so unethically created and a continual heavy drain on so many aspects of society I might consider using them for small, tedious tasks outside of work where I’m forced to.
Also, they don’t do much to aid my work and actively slow me down quite often since I don’t think in words, so I have to translate my logic into a conversational essay for the AI to understand and then debug code someone else wrote. It’s so much faster for me to translate my logic into programming languages directly which follow logic, not conversational norms. I see how it’s useful for people who can’t think in logical steps, though.
Yeah it’s quite disappointing how often that part is conveniently ignored in
The AI corporations are hiring Lemmy snipers now?
Those 4 points for AI code writing are extremely well thought out. I can really respect that.
That reads much too sane for today’s
idiot mud fightdiscussions about AI.
In principle, it’s a pretty good “all-in-one” server, and I even wanted to switch to them until I checked the documentation and saw that the Community version doesn’t filter
Fromwith valid authentication. This means that anyone who is properly authorized can send an email from any address on the server out of the box. In short, if I understood the documentation correctly, it’s a decent option for hosting your own mailbox, but for even small-scale mass use, postfix + dovecot still wins.I do not think that this is correct. Otherwise multiple permission features that are part of the community branch would not make sense. Like “impersonate”.
Do you have a link to the part in the documentation?
Unfortunately, I lost the section. But I’ve already been told that everything works correctly according to the tests, so I was just mistaken.
Ah ok. Was confused. Cause that would have made the community edition mostly useless.
Maybe you mixed that up with the Tenant System in the enterprise Edition?
Yes, possibly. In general, I was wrong.
P.S. very cool server, but it’s a pity there is no analog of dovecot dsync in it. I had already prepared the deployment when I realized that I wouldn’t be able to run 2 isolated servers with synchronization.
Yeah this is straight up wrong from my practical testing
Thank you. Apparently, I misunderstood the documentation. I will try to deploy it anyway.
If we could marry it to openarchiver it would be so sweet.
You understand that, with a store-and-forward service, speed doesn’t mean a damned thing, right?
You DO get that … right?
It’s like gauging English spelling based on what’s popular on Youtube.
It matters when it comes to scaling
The fastest mail server for the slowest and least secure communication protocol 😅
Reminds me of both jumping and jacks together as one. With no dashes or whatever these are “*”
