• 0 Posts
  • 87 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 5th, 2025

help-circle




  • The controversy stems from a few things:

    1. Surveillance Creep Fedora devs have suggested a Windows-style telemetry system. It was proposed as being anonymous and opt-in only, but the fear from the community was that it would slowly change over time (much in the same vein as how Windows telemetry system has done over the years).

    2. Conflict of Interest Red Hat was purchased by IBM which led to the perceived conflict of interest it may then have. RHEL went closed source after this which has been a red flag to many people in the Fedora community.

    3. Flatpak Fedora maintains its own flatpak builds (a lot of which don’t work as they are outdated). Without clearly knowing what you are doing, there is a good chance you’ll be installing outdated Fedora versions as it runs side-by-side with the non-Fedora.

    4. Wayland This I don’t see as an issue, but many users do. The community does mention sometimes that Fedora prioritizes bleeding-edge new over stability. If you combine that with #3 though, I don’t put much weight in it.








  • I had a similar setup to this awhile back. You have to port the number to your VoIP provider of choice and then decide on what client you are going to run (no need for SIM card). I was wanting voice service and only needed limited SMS, so I went with linphone (and played around with zoiper too). If you are needing good SMS support, then JMP is probably the best. It supports both SMS and MMS. You won’t get E911 access I believe, but as data only its a good solution.

    Free wifi is all over the place and if you wire up a mobile hotspot in your car (yes it somewhat defeats the purpose), you can get some pretty decent coverage.



  • I think the idea of an IP address (IPv6 or not) providing anyone a semblance of privacy is wishful thinking in this age. Google ad revenue in the EU is estimated to be lower because the power in GPDR areas isn’t in PII obfuscation, its in the consent model. Positive opt-in to Legitimate Vendor Interest makes tracking difficult, not whether your IP is generic. You have to remember companies like Google are still able to monetize off of users in mobile CG-NAT environments in the US/EU. Given the roughly 150 other metrics Google (or any publisher/SSP would have access to), removing one doesn’t really stem the tide.

    What’s also interesting is how IPs become anonymized. For IPv4, the industry standard I kid you not is to take the 4th octet and mark it zero. That’s it. It just assumes carriers use /24 CIDRs like someone’s home network might. The funny part is what if that was 50.50.0.0/22? A publisher could in practice replace one user’s IP with another user’s IP which means that they still would be passing PII unanonymized which could violate GDPR.

    IPv6 uses the same basic system. 2001:db8:85a3:8d3:1319:8a2e:370:7348 becomes 2001:db8:85a3::. You just truncate at the 64th bit. Rolling through available host bits doesn’t really matter then. IPv6/IPv4 really aren’t ever used for Google user syncing.



  • I think its easier and shorter to say what is the same between the two than different, but some things that are different:

    1. Filesystem (ex. Linux treats everything as a file, more flexibility in organization, more compatibility for differing systems, etc)
    2. Security Model (NTFS vs UNIX, selinux, ACLs, etc)
    3. File Execution (File extensions don’t really matter in Linux - based on file permission not extension, ELF vs PE, etc)
    4. Kernel (Monolithic vs Hybrid kernel systems - Windows hands off to HAL vs the Linux kernel doing core functions)
    5. System Calls (Windows use Win32/NT APIs, Linux uses POSIX-compliant)

    Performance is dependent on use case, but in general:

    1. Linux uses fewer system resources
    2. Linux has faster boot time
    3. Linux has better CPU/disk throughput
    4. Windows has better gaming driver support
    5. Linux has higher stability/control (hence why its the defacto server OS)

    If we stripped all ms’s junk out and made windows open source, would we still prefer linux?

    In what context? For gaming maybe, but that’s one single use. There is more to computers than video games, at least for the majority of Linux users. I wouldn’t trust Windows on any server I run.



  • I would only expose a port to the Internet if users other than myself would be needing access to it. Otherwise, I just keep everything inside a tailscale network so I can access remotely. Usually I believe people put a reverse proxy in front of the Jellyfin server and configure your certificates from there. So Jellyfin to proxy is insecure and then proxy to internet is secure. Lets Encrypt is an easy way to do that. And if you are going to expose a port you definitely want fail2ban monitoring that port.

    If using tailscale funnels, you can technically skip the certificate part as that’s done for you, but that would take away from the learning experience of setting up a proxy.


  • So, the questions really are can your hardware support Windows 11 and if not can you easily flip to Linux.

    1. The Asus Z170 motherboard looks like it supports TPM 2.0, but it doesn’t look like the i7-6700K does as that is a 6th gen Skylake CPU and Win11 starts at 8th gen. You might double check that with the TDM tool Microsoft offers though.

    2. Cakewalk and Ableton appear to work in Linux, but not without some tweaking.

    My suggestion would be to do nothing. If you can’t update without a rebuild and you can’t migrate without a lot work, just do nothing. Your Windows 10 installation will still work. You won’t receive any additional updates for it, but if that is the best solution for you at this time, then that’s what you should go with.

    For the kiddo: Get a body wrap. It lets you because hold the baby to you securely while you do other things. I worked on-call shifts handling downed MPLS circuits for a carrier back in the day with my daughter strapped to me. A couple years later she would get to visit me at work. She was the only 2 year old who technically had PBX configuration experience (I didn’t know the keyboard was still connected).


  • Mordikan@kbin.earthtoLinux@lemmy.mlAnyone use powershell on linux?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    It seems like a well supported shell on windows

    But you aren’t using Windows. You’re also now adding a .NET Core requirement for any Linux box wanting to use it. That means limited functionality as its not the full blown .NET framework. So, compared to something like bash, you now have added requirements with less functionality.

    To answer your original question though, a lot of people prefer zsh as its got a crazy amount of customization you can do. People also like fish due to it being very friendly and interactive.