This is one of the very few areas that AI is really beneficial to. Probably because it includes a lot of backwards engineering and rewriting instructions for different architectures.
You know… the kind of manual labour AI was supposed to handle, so that we could focus on more important tasks. And precisely what 99% of actual AI usage isn’t for.
I’m not very familiar with the project, but their GitHub repo shows Claude as top 3 contributor by commits, and top 11 by additions, so clearly it’s being heavily used.
17 are from AI agents. Every contributor could be using AI tools on their local branch. Git will attribute those changes to the person. No telling how much code is AI generated vs how much is artisanal.
Someone piss in your Cheerios? You’re taking a lot of anger out on me for no reason. All I did was point out that there may or may not be a lot of AI coding beyond the measurable commits that were from agents directly. I made no claims towards something being any level of AI generated.
Be at ease man, nothing worth getting that worked up about.
This is one of the very few areas that AI is really beneficial to. Probably because it includes a lot of backwards engineering and rewriting instructions for different architectures.
You know… the kind of manual labour AI was supposed to handle, so that we could focus on more important tasks. And precisely what 99% of actual AI usage isn’t for.
I’m not very familiar with the project, but their GitHub repo shows Claude as top 3 contributor by commits, and top 11 by additions, so clearly it’s being heavily used.
If you want to check for yourself:
What different architecture? The PS5 is x86.
Neither is anybody else. A codebase entirely written by AI is a codebase nobody is very familiar with.
Of the 200+ commits from the top 3 contributors, 17 are from Claude. 172 are from the project owner. So, ‘entirely written by AI’ is nonsense.
I mean, sick AI burn and all, but you’re leaping to unsupported conclusions.
17 are from AI agents. Every contributor could be using AI tools on their local branch. Git will attribute those changes to the person. No telling how much code is AI generated vs how much is artisanal.
Exactly so claiming it’s all AI is just as retarded as claiming none of it is.
If you can’t prove shit, shut the fuck up, sit the fuck down and gather more information till you can prove shit.
Other wise claim off the facts you have at hand.
Assuming is what assholes and idiots do.
Someone piss in your Cheerios? You’re taking a lot of anger out on me for no reason. All I did was point out that there may or may not be a lot of AI coding beyond the measurable commits that were from agents directly. I made no claims towards something being any level of AI generated.
Be at ease man, nothing worth getting that worked up about.
Probably AI “dev”