• GMac@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Wish the media would stop referring to ai as a boom. It makes no profit, there is no AI boom.

    Nvidia, sk hynix, samsung, and micron have full order books that the latter are taking advantage of, while demonstarting a complete disregard for corporate social responsibility. When openai, anthropic and the hyperscalers behind them default on the future nvidia orders, the gravy train is going to derail real fast. Hopefull at the same time as their sales pipelines fall apart, the chines ram makers will produce consumer chips at a respectable cost and we can see how long the stupid current monopoly lasts. I cant fucking wait.

      • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Isn’t a lot of that money from circular cash flows where they give money to companies like openai to get them to buy GPUs via companies like oracle along with a giant IOU that they will never come close to being able to fulfill who then promise to buy GPUs for the data centers they can’t finish?

        • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Yes and no.

          Yes, there is a large amount of circular money on the books.

          But also they’ve induced a FOMO race to buy hardware where all the big tech companies are selling off chunks and raising money/debt as fast as possible to acquire more GPUs, lest they lose out on the AI race.

          The cost to train a bigger model scales exponentially with increased performance (in theory, with current architecture). So you can only beat your competitors by buying a multiples mire GPU than them.

          NVIDIA is making money, they’re also inducing demand by juicing the race to try and build that FOMO.

          Unfortunately these companies are paying 20x more than consumers are for the same wafers, so for the allocation of RAM to become favourable to keep consumer lever RAM production running prices will need to increase at least that much.

        • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Yes. Ultimately even hardware sellers in this scenario need to be paid by endpoint AI subscribers whose money will filter back along the investment circle.

          Or by taxpayer bailout dollars.

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 hours ago

    First it was the end of Moore’s law, and now the delicate balance that existed for so long between computers getting more memory and software getting more bloated has been wrecked by software more wasteful than anyone could’ve imagined. So much for the so-called Information Age. I guess it’s Disinformation Age time.