I see often people say that the distro you are using doesn’t matter. One can turn any distro into another. And I do not agree with that. If that was true, why do we even have so many distributions? I always said, if distros don’t matter…

  • … why distro hop?
  • … why don’t you use Ubuntu then?
  • … why don’t you recommend Archlinux to a newcomer?
  • … why don’t you use Kali Linux as a server?
  • … why don’t you use Batocera or SteamOS as your daily driver?
  • … why do you trust a community distro more than a corporate distro? (or vice versa)

I don’t think that distros only matter to newcomers. Maybe it matters for experienced users even more.

  • thingsiplay@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Distro really and truly doesn’t matter at all. They all can do the same stuff as each other. It’s entirely all about taste and personal preference

    So you say my personal preference and taste does not matter? A starting point does not matter and I should randomly pick something from Distrowatch, maybe the newest updated entry in their database? Just because it CAN be turned into a different distro, does not invalidate the value of having a good starting point that fits my needs perfectly. Also you are wrong that these are the only factors. There is also the factor if I trust the maintainers of the repository, and probably other factors important for choosing a distribution.

    • fozid@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      No, the opposite. The only thing that matters is your personal taste and preferences. It’s purely and entirely about your perception. They include if you trust the maintainers, the logo, the package manager, the website, the distro name and everything else. You just choose what is important to you based on your taste and preference and choose the distro that aligns with that taste. Which distro you choose doesn’t matter at all, just pick the one you want to. If the most important thing to you is the colour pink, pick one that uses pink.

      • thingsiplay@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        No, choosing a distribution is not like choosing a color. First there is compatibility. Some hardware work better than others or are better supported. Then you also put “trust” into personal taste, which is not just a taste, but a fundamental design decision that has nothing to do with taste. I wouldn’t recommend a newcomer who does not know how Linux works and does not have time to workout how to install and maintain Archlinux. In example my grandma. Or someone who just want to game on it like a console.

        I don’t care how you name these points, the fact is, that choice of distribution is very important and matters a lot.

          • thingsiplay@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I’m fine with disagreeing, that’s the reason why I even started this discussion. As long as arguments are brought up and it stays nice.

    • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      So you say my personal preference and taste does not matter?

      The point is, the amount of time and effort it takes to tune any distro to your personal preference.

      There are distros that fit your needs out of the box and there are distros that need hours of setting up and tuning to fit them.

      • thingsiplay@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        There are distros that fit your needs out of the box and there are distros that need hours of setting up and tuning to fit them.

        And that exactly is the reason why the distribution matters.