In the latest episode of “they will always sell you out” - they sold you out! Who would’ve thought.

Hoping for a good alternative client to appear, the writing is on the wall. Vaultwarden can’t exist without “leeching” off of Bitwarden.

    • Taasz/Woof@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      KeePassXC + KeePassDX is probably the best option, with the downside of no way to sync easily (syncthing is probably the best option there)

      I might switch back at some point, been getting frustrated with the bitwarden extension performance always being so poor.

      • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        My first password manager was KeePassXC.

        Hooked it up with Syncthing, and I’ve never had issues aside from the occasion database duplicate.

      • auntieclokwise@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I use KeePass with KeeAnywhere. KeePass can natively sync over network share, FTP, or WebDav. With plugins, it can sync over SSH, FTPS, Amazon S3 compatible buckets (including open source compatible versions you host yourself), Azure, Box, Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive, and more.

      • Elaina@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yeah the performance is what made me install the desktop app, but then it’s 1gb in size

          • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I use Nextcloud myself, but if people don’t want to host a server or fuck with syncthing, they can sync it however they want as long as they use a strong enough master password/phrase (which they should be anyway.).

      • German The Jackal@pawb.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Merge conflicts are a concern for KeePass, especially for those that don’t want to resolve them. Sync is difficult. AFAIK this is a very common issue with Syncthing setups.

        Also, the portability from Bitwarden to KP leaves a bit to be desired, though that’s probably 90% on BW.

        • eli@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          56 minutes ago

          I’ve been using KeePass with Syncthing for 5+ years now and I think I’ve only had a sync issue once in all this time.

          Granted I do make sure I only use the database on one device at a time (so not making edits on desktop and my phone at the same time) and I’m using XC and DX clients not the OG KeePass program.

          I’m curious what is causing sync issues to make it “common”, I use my db every day.

        • elmicha@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I’m using Keepass2Android (and KeepassXC). It can copy the database from/to an sftp server, so it can easily merge the entries. I don’t have the sftp server exposed to the Internet, because when I’m not home, nobody will change the database at home.

    • slate@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      KeePass isn’t going anywhere. They’re also dragging their feet on passkey support, so you might go with KeepassXC.

      • eightys3v3n@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        They also don’t effectively allow collaboration though, which is my cheif reason for using a cloud hosted password manager.

          • eightys3v3n@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Sharing passwords between groups of people so everyone always has the up to date version. Not breaking the world if two people try to modify the same entry as some file syncing solutions do.

            • Flagstaff@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Hmm, interesting, though isn’t that a fault of the organization not having an account-linking system so that each person could have their own credentials but can still access the unified content? This workaround seems… flimsy, unless I’m not picturing a legit scenario in which no other method is as good, or something.

              • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                You know why most cloud based services charge money? For stuff like this, because it’s not free to implement and maintain.

                Easy and fault-proof password sharing and syncing needs software and hardware to do. You either set it up and maintain it yourself, or pay for a product that does it - like Bitwarden.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Sure they do. Multiple people can have a file open at the same time. I use it for exactly this every day at work.

          With KeePassXC, that is. I don’t know if other flavors have different support. I use XC primarily for the browser extension.

          • eightys3v3n@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            And you can both modify the same things without causing horrible conflict issues? And you can share only parts of your vault with someone rather than having entirely different vaults you have to switch between? I’m assuming you mean putting the file somewhere like Google Drive, and you can access it offline even if you can’t edit it offline? For feature parity with Bitwarden, obviously ideally one could edit any time and it would resolve problems when it came back online if there were any but Bitwarden doesn’t allow this.

            • frongt@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Yes, no conflicts. I don’t know if you can only share part of vault; I just created a separate one for a separate team.

              I wouldn’t put it in Google Drive or anything like that. The separate sync logic will definitely cause conflicts.

              I’m not worried about having access if I’m offline, because if I’m offline I’m not going to be able to log into anything anyway.

              • eightys3v3n@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                5 hours ago

                I guess a laptop, server, IoT device, or WiFi connection when your main device doesn’t have internet is out of scope for you?
                Like fixing my laptop and not wanting to type the new password into my phone instead of copy/paste, sync when online?
                And how are you sharing a file, to multiple people anywhere in the world realtime ish, without a cloud service you or someone else hosts? Doesn’t that necessitate some syncronization logic?

                • frongt@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  It’s hosted on a local network share, so we don’t need Internet access.

                  If can’t copy paste, I just type it out.

                  We use a VPN to the office.

        • 4am@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Two articles behind a paywall, one that won’t load, and another article that says the big problem with passkeys is…people are unfamiliar with them.

          If anyone tells you that Passkeys are bad, they’re a liar. Way more safe than passwords, full stop.

          Just don’t let Microsoft or Apple tie them to your device. You don’t have to do that.

          • Flagstaff@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Are you calling me a liar? That’s pretty weird; it’s not like I’m telling you to stick to passwords while I move to passkeys. With that said, though, get Bypass Paywalls Clean (Mozilla-only, as far as I know) and you’ll never see another paywall again. I forgot about having that.

            Just don’t let Microsoft or Apple tie them to your device. You don’t have to do that.

            The problem is that this is where it’s eventually going to lead to.

            • fushuan@piefed.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Not really, Vaultwarden/bitwa4den offer passkey support. When I log into a service a popup shows on my extension, I click it and I’m in. It’s not gonna lead to device locking if you don’t want to…