Absolutely, but OP will have to explain a bit to their boss why. Maybe we can help OP there?
Fuck that walled garden is not a business value added task so can we, as a community who cares how openness, translate that to C-suite MBA speech?
- Apple devices are more expensive to manage (source? time from OP to do so? additional hardware? TCO comparisons?)
- Apple devices are less compatible with software solution we use in the company (examples?)
- Apple devices …
Maybe Ubuntu, RedHat, and other company selling FLOSS have reports to help there.
This is nearly 20 years old but give the idea of the words needed https://www.cio.com/article/274764/operating-systems-the-tco-of-operating-systems-compare-the-big-oses.html
Here is something a bit more recent https://umatechnology.org/comparing-operating-system-costs-windows-macos-linux/ but again this isn’t to give an “answer” but at least understanding management perspective, which is not really a technical one but rather a cost/value one.
I wouldn’t build anything significant on the RPi Zero and instead would try to build elsewhere, namely on a more powerful machine with the same architecture, or cross-build as others suggested.
That being said, what’s interesting IMHO with container image building is that you can rely on layers. So… my advice would be to find the existing image supported by your architecture then rely on it to layer on top of it. This way you only build on the RPi what is truly not available elsewhere.