Considering they made Chrome an entire OS… It was sort of necessary for that and probably minimal to bring it to the regular desktop browser.
That’s both plausible and insightful on your part. Thanks!
That said, just because they could easily do it on the non-ChromeOS version of the browser doesn’t mean they should have.
how else is a web based update app for a usb device supposed to work?!
It’s not! It’s a thing nobody in their right mind should want to do in the first place!
That question is like asking “how else is a shotgun-based dental pick supposed to work?” The things just don’t go together and you shouldn’t try to force them to!
Also, we already had an appropriate technology for this sort of thing (having a cheaply-made app that runs everywhere and doesn’t have to be pretty): it’s called “plain old fuckin’ Java.”
WebUSB is absurd and shouldn’t exist. Web apps should not ever be able to work with USB devices! The core concept is wrong!
A website shouldn’t even be allowed to know if I have a USB port at all, let alone anything else about my hardware. I’m not even convinced it should be allowed to know the viewport size of the browser window! All these APIs just make the attack surface fucking gargantuan and open up infinite opportunities for browser fingerprinting. They should be Considered Harmful and abolished.
It’s also bad because why the fuck should a web browser have that much access to the hardware to begin with?!
If you already are their tech support, you probably could’ve forcibly switched then a long time ago.
At least, that’s how I treat my computer-illiterate boomer parents. For them, it’s “use what I tell you to use or you’re on your own.” To be fair, on their last few computers that was MacOS, but their iMac from 2013(?) got so obsolete it wasn’t good enough anymore, so as of a few months ago they’re on a mini PC running Linux whether they like it or not.
Web browser tabs.
(I only have 64GB, but that’s my answer. Firefox still eventually runs out of memory and crashes, BTW. Not blaming the browser itself; I think there’s a memory leak in the JS in some of the tabs I keep open.)
Nah, SteamOS is a normal Linux. It counts.
As the owner of multiple cars from the '90s and 2000s, I 100% need a Linux head unit.
Because I have self-respect.
That’s not “questionable,” that’s straight-up evil and totalitarian. There’s not any ambiguity about it, at all: the ESA wants to destroy private property ownership and subjugate us all as cattle to be milked.
It doesn’t fucking matter. Not even a little bit. It’s 1000% an attack on property rights and must be stopped by any means necessary.
Nothing “borderline” about it.
I think the creature comforts of steamos do stand out. Easy menu for system level FSR for example. Resume game from shutdown looks great too.
Sure, but you can (allegedly – I haven’t actually tried) get that on any AMD system, not just the Steam Machine.
and I will likely not have to tinker much to get a solid experience.
I’m sure the Steam Machine will be fine, but I reject the notion that that differentiates it from any other AMD-based PC running Linux. My AMD-based Linux PC as built a year ago (which is faster than a Steam Machine, BTW) didn’t require much tinkering, and neither did my previous AMD-based Linux PC built about eight years ago. Proton didn’t exist back then, but as soon as it came out it basically had zero problems related to the hardware (as opposed to incompatibilities caused by the lack of maturity of the software itself). With AMD, Linux basically Just Works, and has done for many, many years.
(Also, you don’t have to spend a lot to get a reliable 3D printer. You just have to pay attention to product reviews and such. I’ve got a Creality Ender 3 V3 SE, which was generally considered to be the “best” inexpensive printer as of a few years ago, and it’s been fine. The tradeoff for the low price is lack of fancy features like an enclosure or multiple extruders, not reliability.)
Also, some people are willing to pay a premium for good looks and/or HDMI CEC.
I find it hilarious that a government is sponsoring something with “UwU” in the name.
“Just as” is doing a lot of heavy lifting there, IMO. Can they be subverted against the people they are supposed to serve? Of course. Is it as likely as a for-profit corporation doing it? Hell no, I’d say.
Pretty sure he meant something like “not a nonprofit or government entity.”
No, because until the dot-com era when “tech bros” first became a thing, a lot of the computing pioneers were leftist/hippie counterculture types. Think MIT AI Lab (RMS), The Homebrew Computer Club (Woz, Captain Crunch), Germany’s Chaos Computer Club, etc.
Further reading:
https://bigthink.com/the-present/1960s-counterculture-created-silicon-valley/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_the_Dormouse_Said