Install your own from one of the parent distros: Debian, Fedora/openSUSE, sources (eg. Exherbo, Gentoo), the state-based one I always forget.
deadcatbounce
- 0 Posts
- 17 Comments
deadcatbounce@reddthat.comto Linux@lemmy.ml•Atomic Linux Distros: What Barriers Stand Between You and Making the Switch?2·29 days agoAn atomic distro is one which is in my understanding, has a basis in libostree, right? I’m familiar with the Fedora/RedHat versions but not any others.
Immutable distributions, for me to are wonderful when they are sparse. I don’t want anything on my OS which I don’t use at least once on a while.
If I install Fedora (RPM) Workstation to a large extent I can remove programs that I don’t want. Whereas SilverBlue (libostree), I’m stuck with whatever the maintainers template (is there a blocking mechanism?).
However, with sparse Fedora-IoT, I can’t break it - to a large extent - and it doesn’t have anything I don’t want.
I always install minimal versions of OSs, from Fedora (Everything iso), to Debian (debootstrap) to ArchLinux to Exherbo to Talos, just keep them cleaner longer. Then I fix them until they break!
I think they’re ideal for those starting out in Linux because they are not ready to break; not saying that they’re not for others too.
There’s enough documentation, at least for Fedora atomic distros, to make your own custom spin.
I’m not switching for any desktop, unless the basic OS is minimal; but have switched for Raspberry Pi OS to Fedora IoT (atomic distro), at least temporarily.
deadcatbounce@reddthat.comto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Traefik with Socket Activation via Podman QuadletsEnglish1·29 days agoI’m not criticising you. I cannot validity criticise you, even if I was so inclined (I’m not), because I cannot proficiently grasp the subject matter. I would like to understand, NOT criticise. You’ve written an engaging piece which is opaque to me; apparently a contradiction. Hopefully I’ve rephrased that enough times to get across that no criticism is intended. 😁
I don’t know the product names. I don’t tend to be focused on product names because they come and go. Your first message didn’t help me.
Your last precis is just what I needed. Ideal. Thank-you. I now know what you’re trying to achieve.
deadcatbounce@reddthat.comto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Traefik with Socket Activation via Podman QuadletsEnglish1·29 days agodeleted by creator
deadcatbounce@reddthat.comto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Traefik with Socket Activation via Podman QuadletsEnglish2·30 days agoWasn’t being critical at all. Not expecting you to write for anyone.
I wondered what this actually provides. If you were explaining to someone with a good knowledge of the world, not grandma!!
deadcatbounce@reddthat.comto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Traefik with Socket Activation via Podman QuadletsEnglish11·30 days agoThanks fella. What do they actually do? Elevator pitch stylie!
deadcatbounce@reddthat.comto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Traefik with Socket Activation via Podman QuadletsEnglish4·1 month agoExcuse the ignorance, what am I actually reading about here?
I read the first few paragraphs and an out of my league.
What are ‘we’ trying to achieve?
I live these old stories. Kinda gave up programming by 1996. It was a short-sighted thing to do!
Having grown up with Acorn Atoms. BBC Micro, MS and DRDOS, Gem, Xerox something, Windows 1, don’t remember 2, 3.0 to 3.11, NT. I didn’t realise how nice early (2004) Linux was until I used it in a Windows server hosted VM to handle my phone calls (VoIP@home or something it was called).
I did everything I could to ditch Windows after that. The webification of QuickBooks was the final release.
You should go see Gentoo or something if ArchLinux causes you problems.
It’s my go-to rescue cum doing-backups cum new-install distribution because it’s clean (meaning low cruft), minimalist, and most importantly, rolling. I run it as a console OS. I adore it.
Have I run it as my Workstation OS? Yes. Would I again? No. It was too fragile then.
Pacman is too strange to use with the options reduced to letters and having to include the double dash every time you remember the long form. Gimme dnf, Aptitude or flatpak.
My daily driver is Fedora. Is my heart in my mouth every six months when 4,000 packages all need reinstalling? Yes.
Have I tried Debian Testing&Sid as semi-rolling? Yes, fantastic, until they did something weird with systemd instead of just doing the conf locations as intended like everyone else. And the weak-dependencies lists were unfunny. Did I mention I loved aptitude?!
Have I tried, source distros (exherbo, Gentoo, funtoo)? Yes, never got any work done. I was always compiling something for that 1% corner-case performance gain.
Don’t think I’ll try anything else save maybe openSUSE or that NixOS. The first seriously, the second for fun - NixOS smells a tiny bit like Gentoo or ArchLinux to me (sorry, not sorry).
Personally, I think bro needs an immutable Linux OS. Fedora SilverBlue, openSUSE MicroOS, the ArchLinux one.
Then someone needs to write a timer such that when he’s really concentrating hard at 2am, it stops and puts some graphical meme on the screen for three hours. Then he’ll feel at home.
deadcatbounce@reddthat.comto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•FTTH upgrade - getting my LAN multi gig readyEnglish4·1 month agoUniFi seem to have dabbled with 2.5 GBE briefly and then jumped to 10. I’m guessing that 10 will be the way to go.
You’re looking at cat 6A patch leads rather than 7. 7 requires different but RJ45 compatible connectors, I believe. Yes, I’m still trying to understand what the difference is.
I have a 2.5G router, the CG Max. A 1 G switch (waiting for a reasonably priced 10 G) and a 10 G WAP. It’s a bit of a mess!
deadcatbounce@reddthat.comto Linux@lemmy.ml•Why disable ssh login with root on a server if I only log in with keys, not password?14·1 month agoOne always minimises attack surfaces and the possibility of fat fingered mistakes. The lower privileges that you grant yourself the better.
You’d think that Dave Cutler who, I believe, designed Windows NT coming from a Unix style background would have followed these principles but no. I discovered *nix late sadly.
deadcatbounce@reddthat.comto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•How do I fit a network card with a physical x4 slot into an x1 slot?English0·2 months agoDoes one good to be challenged (at least) occasionally.
I learned something new.
deadcatbounce@reddthat.comto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•How do I fit a network card with a physical x4 slot into an x1 slot?English1·2 months agoUp voted
I stand corrected. Thanks for the heads up… Really wasn’t expecting that.
Apologies to OP. I don’t know how to reference users: marauding_gibberish142@lemmybdzero
deadcatbounce@reddthat.comto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•How do I fit a network card with a physical x4 slot into an x1 slot?English0·2 months agoIn terms of physical connections you’ve said that the card needs the x4. Not sure what there is to say further.
Can’t get a 30 cm ruler into a 15 cm pencil case.
Maybe I’ve totally misunderstood your post.
deadcatbounce@reddthat.comto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•How do I fit a network card with a physical x4 slot into an x1 slot?English0·2 months agoI don’t think you do.
A x1 will fit in a x4 but not the other way around.
For many years I installed Fedora from scratch (almost as if my PC was a Linux container and then added a kernel setup) to be exactly as I wanted it no cruft, no bloat. I did that with other distros as well, Debian didn’t recommend SELinux.
Last year I installed it from scratch using the installer and that included SELinux. With changes in SELinux policy, I found an installed flatpak which successive iterations didn’t like SELinux or tried to operate outside it. Fixing it was easy but I didn’t do so until I understood why it was violating.
I had unknowingly subscribed to the FUD about SELinux, I doesn’t get in my way. Maybe I’m not as elite as I thought I was!
(half replying to other comments as well as yours)
If you have a look at the btrfs mailing lists post that introduced RAID1c34, they were created because RAID56 were not considered viable or fixable. It’s in couched language but reasonably clear. I don’t think you’re thinking of using those (RAID56) but don’t.
Never had any btrfs problems that weren’t self generated or date from a really sticky period in btrfs’s history (years ago, 4.13 or maybe 3.13). I’ve used RAID56 until RAID1c34 became available and RAID10 where I could.
Haven’t tried LUKS - btrfs though, although effectively no worse than putting btrfs in a VM (which is fine if slow at the time), albeit a bit more computationally intensive.