Baron Von J

ok, thanks.

Does AirScan on Linux work to scan-tohcomputer from the device? Or do you have to run [x]sane or some other interactive app on your computer? I’m wanting to use my R Pi as a headless server/backend that a scammer sends to, without having to use any desktop software interactively.

With the dedicated scanners you’ve tried, which actually work to perform the scanning using the buttons on the scanner instead of running [x]sane or equivalent on your computer?

I’m on an older Synology diskstation (418play) and I found Emby was better packaged to use on that platform. On a Pi I might have gone for Jellyfin instead.

I have gone from 0 to 3 in a short time, and I find myself wanting ones that I currently don’t have the skills to make proper use of…

One of us! One of us! 😅

I feel strongly that I had done simple drag and drop before, but doing some searches it sure sounds like I must be imagining it. I never tried it with Linux. There’s a guitar pedals !guitarpedals@lemmy.world community that you might try cross-posting to.

If you can read that, see that they’re on major version 1 with a minor version over 100, and you still think they’re using semver, then that’s on you.

I don’t think they’re using semver. That’s literally what I’m complaining about. I genuinely don’t understand why people here are taking it so hard that I wish the Immich devs were using semver.

As this project is clearly not following semver, the semver guidelines aren’t applicable and haven’t been violated.

Wonderful. Good for them. Good for you. Good for everyone who disagrees with me. Just not for me. And that’s just my opinion, man. And that should be ok with you for me to have it.

🍻

You can argue the correctness or not of the guidelines put out at semver.org, but I don’t think there’s any room to argue that announcing a 1.x with a change the developers say is a breaking change, which is what Immich have done, fits within the semver.org guidelines.

But it is a service that clients connect to via an API.

Yes, I understand they have declared that. Their declaration does not, however, negate the common semantic versioning standards, found at semver.org. These common standards are significant for admins running shared systems where they automatic upgrade processes based on common semantic versioning rules. The software will stabilize and they will adopt a more stringent policy. But they should still be releasing 0.x versions since they’ve not yet reached it.

Yes indeed. 🙂

A breaking change should have been 2.0, not a new 1.<minor> release.

It should still be 0.<minor> if they’ve not reached the stability for keeping backwards compatibly in all 1.x releases.

Breaking changes should warrant a 2.0 version, not a 1.minor version.

Edit: I am basing my comments on https://semver.org/ guidelines

I’ve been meaning to give this a try on my Synology.

But breaking changes in a point release? Not cool.

For PDF is does splitting and merging and rotating pages.

I gave of MacOS when an OS update included a firmware rollback which disabled gigabit Ethernet on the NIC. So the Fedora install.may have updated the firmware or changed a firmware setting.