Ideally running the .py python foobar.py will be ideal, otherwise an .appimage

I think I will have to build it my self (the .appimage ) :)

I like light system and moreover I like the simplicity of .appimage

Unlike some systems such as Snap and Flatpak, AppImages work with very little support from the base distribution.

To run the app, an user simply needs to run this file — there’s no intermediate installation step.

source: https://www.booleanworld.com/creating-linux-apps-run-anywhere-appimage/

Thanks @fratermus@lemmy.sdf.org But graph-easy is text to graph. and I’m looking to draw ! so draw to ~graph(ASCII) but it’s a nice program too.

I’m not, I’m on MX Linux with SysVinit.

Thanks @Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show , “Packaging” is not mandatory when creating a software, like it’s was written It could run as .py trough python executable. but here it seem not

Otherwise I’m ok with .appimage format/packing.