Whenever I screw something up or something goes sideways. Or when I’m migrating from one host to another.
- 0 Posts
- 19 Comments
Not really useless, it’s an extra layer of management (a good thing). The Proxmox system can be nearly static while giving you external level management of the OS that manages the containers.
I have a 3 server Proxmox cluster running various VMs doing different things. Some of those VMs are my container systems.
Besides, you can run containers directly on Proxmox itself.
I’ve never worked with buildpack, so that’s interesting
Sure, ZFS snapshots are dead simple and fast. But you’d need to ensure that each container and its volumes are created in each respective dataset.
And none of this is implying that it’s hard. The top comment was criticizing OP for using VMs instead of containers. Neither one is better than the other for all use cases.
I have a ton of VMs for various use cases, and some of those VMs are container/Docker hosts. Each tool where it works best.
Backups? I have an automatic job running every night.
It’s not the same. You then need to manage volumes separately from images, or if you’re mounting a host folder for the Jellyfin files then you have to manage those separately via the host.
Container images are supposed to be stateless. So then if you’re only banking up the volumes, then you need to somehow track which Jellyfin version it’s tied to, in case you run into any issues.
A VM is literally all of that but in a much more complete package.
I can backup an entire VM snapshot very quickly and then restore it in a matter of minutes. Everything from the system files, database, Jellyfin version and configs, etc. All easily backed up and restored in an easy to manage bundle.
A container is not as easy to manage in the same way.
My personal problem is that I’m so bad at using it
It’s not you, it’s just that Windows is badly designed.
CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.worldto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Jeff Geerling: Self-hosting your own media considered harmful (updated). Youtube removed his content, saying that self hosting content is "dangerous or harmful content"English4·2 months agoIt’s been talked about to death. It’s been analysed to death.
But here’s a very detailed and thorough breakdown:
CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.worldto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Jeff Geerling: Self-hosting your own media considered harmful (updated). Youtube removed his content, saying that self hosting content is "dangerous or harmful content"English208·2 months agoHe’s on float plane
I’ll never support anyone on that platform. I’ll never do anything to give LTT a cent.
CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.worldto Linux@lemmy.ml•Installing Linux Doesn't Need to Change. The Experience Does.12·3 months agois still clunky compared to others.
Wut?
CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.worldto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•That's all folks, Plex is starting to charge for sharingEnglish2·4 months agoPlex (originally) and Jellyfin are a centralized way of managing your media with aesthetic and easy to use interfaces. I have one Jellyfin server and I have a Netflix/Display+ type interaction with my media. I have the same content on my phone, wife’s phone, my desktop, laptop, my TV, etc.
All watch history, recommendations, up next queue, and so on.
And with the right setup (Wireguard in my case) I can access that content from anywhere.
CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.worldto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Risks of self-hosting a public-facing forum?English0·5 months agoThree incoherent replies with jumbled run-on sentences.
the businesses with clean perfect sites tend to be the scams
Uhhh, no. Objectively no. A legit website is not going to have spelling mistakes and broken links. Looking professional and thorough is a direct lead to increased business. What you just said is completely false, and frankly idiotic.
Everything else you said (in all three replies) is just a jumbled mess of a brain dump that I’m not even going to try and address any of it.
CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.worldto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Risks of self-hosting a public-facing forum?English0·5 months agoNo, I didn’t say this “isn’t a nice site”. I said it’s “suspicious as hell”.
Having a working site and a navigable “About Us” page isn’t “nice”. It’s the bare minimum I would expect of any legitimate nice or ugly site.
There’s just a lot on their site that reeks of sloppy scammers.
CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.worldto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Risks of self-hosting a public-facing forum?English0·5 months agoIts so cheap to just get a vps from a littlecreekhosting deal
This site seems suspicious as hell. Incredibly basic site, no info on where they’re located, and the “About Us” links aren’t even links. There’s no About Us page.
It’s true for any variation of Linux. Hell, the vulnerability (Mimikatz) that was crucial in the most expensive cyber security attack in history is still there in Windows.
And for X11 to be exploited you would need to get and run malicious code in the first place. The Linux security model kicks in before you get to that point.
The security model is also very different between Linux and Windows. Linux is just inherently more secure.
Absolutely not.