Linux phones are still behind android and iPhone, but the gap shrank a surprising amount while I wasn’t looking. These are damn near usable day to day phones now! But there are still a few things that need done and I was wondering what everyone’s thoughts on these were:

1 - tap to pay. I don’t see how this can practically be done. Like, at all.

2 - android auto/apple CarPlay emulation. A Linux phones could theoretically emulate one of these protocols and display a separate session on the head unit of a car. But I dont see any kind of project out there that already does this in an open-source kind of way. The closest I can find are some shady dongles on amazon that give wireless CarPlay to head units that normally require USB cables. It can be done, but I don’t see it being done in our community.

3 - voice assistants. wether done on device or phoning into our home servers and having requests processed there, this should be doable and integrated with convenient shortcuts. Home assistant has some things like this, and there’s good-old Mycroft blowing around out there still. Siri is used every day by plenty of people and she sucks. If that’s the benchmark I think our community can easily meet that.

I started looking at Linux phones again because I loathe what apple is doing to this UI now and android has some interesting foldables but now that google is forcing Gemini into everything and you can’t turn it off, killing third party ROMS, and getting somehow even MORE invasive, that whole ecosystem seems like it’s about to march right off a cliff so its not an option anymore for me.

  • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    Are they must haves? I don’t use tap to pay, pretty useless feature for me.

    Cars? I don’t want or need android auto. Bluetooth is the only thing I care about.

    Navigation on the device is good enough for me, it doesnt need to use the screen.

    I have no interest in mobile banking, but that could be an issue if people are used to sending money to each other instantly via a bank app.

    • Sl00k@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Absolutely must haves for me personally, I use each probably daily. I don’t carry any cards with me and exclusively use tap to pay.

      • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Tap to pay is a choice, with a viable alternative.

        You could choose to NOT use tap to pay, carry a bank card, and it would have basically no impact on your ability to conduct your life.

        But I agree the banking app itself is a big problem, and something that cannot be lived without.

        • overload@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Not to berate you but this is a bit of a Linux-pilled response.

          Tap to pay and Android auto are conveniences that are of importance to a lot of people. Not everyone chooses to use it, but losing those features will mean Linux phones will exclude a significant proportion of the population that would otherwise be open to using them.

        • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          You can also choose NOT to have a phone at all… Or a bank account.

          Just because you personally don’t find something needed doesn’t mean it’s true for others.

        • chaospatterns@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          It is a choice, but one that I find important to adopting an alternate. I keep my wallet slim on purpose. Telling people their choices are wrong because you don’t agree with them is not going to get widespread adoption which is important for the long term health and success of such a ambitious project.

    • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      If you actually see what needs each country has for phones (by law), and also what needs normal users have, you would change your mind. It’s not just about one user here, one user there that doesn’t need these features, but the whole. I have an e/OS Murena phone (very private foss android fork) for example that I can’t use here in Greece because it doesn’t do banking (the bank app doesn’t work). Additionally, here in Greece we need gov apps (e.g. to get prescriptions, and to not have our ID with us all the time). These don’t run on “foss” versions of android (let alone clear linux OSs).

      • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah that would make me pretty damn angry. What about people who don’t have phones at all, what are they supposed to do?

        No country should require the technology of 2 monopolies by law.