Some thoughts on how useful Anubis really is. Combined with comments I read elsewhere about scrapers starting to solve the challenges, I’m afraid Anubis will be outdated soon and we need something else.

  • ryannathans@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yeah has seemed like a bit of a waste of time, once that difficulty gets scaled up and expiration down it’s gonna get annoying to use the web on phones

    • non_burglar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I had to get my glasses to re-read this comment.

      You know why anubis is in place on so many sites, right? You are literally blaming the victims for the absolute bullshit AI is foisting on us all.

      • ryannathans@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Yes, I manage cloudflare for a massive site that at times gets hit with millions of unique bot visits per hour

        • non_burglar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          So you know that this is the lesser of the two evils? Seems like you’re viewing it from client’s perspective only.

          No one wants to burden clients with Anubis, and Anubis shouldn’t exist. We are all (server operators and users) stuck with this solution for now because there is nothing else at the moment that keeps these scrapers at bay.

          Even the author of Anubis doesn’t like the way it works. We all know it’s just more wasted computing for no reason except big tech doesn’t give a care about anyone.

          • ryannathans@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            My point is, and the author’s point is, it’s not computation that’s keeping the bots away right now. It’s the obscurity and challenge itself getting in the way.

      • billwashere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I don’t think so. I think he’s blaming the “solution” as being a stop gap at best and painful for end-users at worst. Yes the AI crawlers have caused the issue but I’m not sure this is a great final solution.

        As the article discussed, this is essentially “an expensive“ math problem meant to deter AI crawlers but in the end it ain’t really that expensive. It’s more like they put two door handles on a door hoping the bots are too lazy to turn both of them but also severely slowing down all one-handed people. I’m not sure it will ever be feasible to essentially figure out how to have one bot determine if the other end is also a bot without human interaction.

        • ryannathans@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          It works because it’s a bit of obscurity, not because it’s expensive. Once it’s a big enough problem to the scrapers, the scrapers will adapt and then the only option is to make it more obscure/different or crank up the difficulty which will slow down genuine users much more