Continuwuity Is a single binary that runs with very minimal memory and literally zero CPU footprint, and basically minimal setup, where Synapse on the same hardware was a mess to setup hard to configure, and was noticeable both on CPU and RAM usage.
Maybe for many users synapse scale better, i have no idea, but for a single user or few users instance, no way.
Good to know!
Can they keep up with synapse in regard of matrix protocol standard? What about some experimental features that we can easily activate in synapse?
Continuwuity Is a single binary that runs with very minimal memory and literally zero CPU footprint, and basically minimal setup, where Synapse on the same hardware was a mess to setup hard to configure, and was noticeable both on CPU and RAM usage.
Maybe for many users synapse scale better, i have no idea, but for a single user or few users instance, no way.
Good to know! Can they keep up with synapse in regard of matrix protocol standard? What about some experimental features that we can easily activate in synapse?
All i Need and use works, if you have anything specific on mind…
MAS or element calls using livekit for example?
I use a instance running continuwuity and every new/experimental (i.e, matrix 2.0) feature in the client works
From the talk: It doesn’t need MAS as that’s built in, and calls work.
I have no idea what mas is, and I never did element calls. You should try it or check online.