usdeurpes@lemmy.zip to Linux@lemmy.ml · 15 hours agoLinus Torvalds Working On A Hefty Linux Kernel Improvement With Claude Codewww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square82linkfedilinkarrow-up1201arrow-down114file-text
arrow-up1187arrow-down1external-linkLinus Torvalds Working On A Hefty Linux Kernel Improvement With Claude Codewww.phoronix.comusdeurpes@lemmy.zip to Linux@lemmy.ml · 15 hours agomessage-square82linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·8 hours ago My code has always been free software so I don’t object to it being in the training sets because that seems fair use according to the four freedoms. But what about the output of an LLM that was trained on free software, then being used in closed source, commercial software? 🙁 inefficient CI loops retesting the whole world for a single line change. Think of savings that could be made! Oh yeah, I’m definitely with you there. Oh gosh. They probably should be up in arms! Both are bad things, simultaneously, as two things can be!
But what about the output of an LLM that was trained on free software, then being used in closed source, commercial software? 🙁
Oh yeah, I’m definitely with you there. Oh gosh.
They probably should be up in arms! Both are bad things, simultaneously, as two things can be!