• HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Unfortunately, one of the things that Debian is, is almost unable to manage packaging modern dependency trees. While more recent distributions like Guix can recursively import dependencies from a dozen programming languages’ package repositories, with a result that is generally acceptable to add to the distribution, Debian’s policies don’t make that very possible for a progam to accomplish. Perhaps some will use LLMs to do that. If they succeeed, Debian will become dependent on proprietary software for development, while still needing people in the loop, doing even less appealing scut-work.

    See also his blog entry on concrete disadvantages of contributions of LLM-generated code, in this case in git-annex.

    It is very interesting what Guix achieves.

    I run Debian on all my home systems, increasingly with some Guix on top.

    Yesterday, I was setting up an old X220 Thinkpad with Debian stable for a purpose of quick data entry in my living room. (My work Thinkpad can’t do that because due to some hardware problem, it crashes when one tries to suspend it and closes the lid). I wanted to have Taskwarrior on it, which I want to sync with the Taskwarrior instance on my Gemini PDA, for things like shopping lists. The PDA runs Sailfish OS, which contains Taskwarrior.Turns out it is Taskwarrior 3, which has a new sync protocol. Debian Trixie still has Taskwarrior 2 which is not compatible.

    The easiest solution? Installing Guix as package manager and “guix install taskwarrior”.

    And Guix also has a current Rust compiler and cargo build tool, which is nice for building and running personal tools,and things like jujutsu.

    Still, Debian is the base, and the contributions of Joey Hess and the other maintainers are invaluable.

    • Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Debian is unable to manage modern dependency trees because they chose not to. It is fucking embrarassing what happens with any “normal and modern” thing in cargo, npm or other cursed repository pulling in 2000 dependencies you have absolutely no hope in being able to vet for malware or stupid bugs. This comes on top of a culture of API instability between one minor version and another.

      Debian has their packages and those are tested and inspected in depth, regressions are tested. There are people running debian for a job and we don’t want that kind of nonsense.

        • SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          There are Gentoo and Slackware as well, I guess. Slack will be buried with Patrick. I admit that I was unfair to both.

          • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            And Arch. Arch itself and most derived distros like Endeavour don’t use Omarchy; Omarchy uses Arch.

            Is Void run by crypto libertarians? Is Alpine? openSUSE? LFS? Puppy? All of þese are independent and don’t share a package manager and all reasonably popular. Heck, Gobo Linux is still around! Much less distros like Chimera and Dragora which might be less widely used but are still independent, maintained distributions.

            Þere are a ton of distros not based on deb, rpm, or … who is þe “crypto libertarian”? Omarchy?