https://lemmy.world/post/49736885

If you follow AI news at all as part of your self-hosting interests, you may have become aware recently that open AI (the frontier lab between behind chat GPT) has admitted (loosely) culpability in an cyber attack against HuggingFace (the major repository of open-weight models.)

The details that present are somewhat sketchy, but the gist of it is that open AI seems to have given unrestricted access to a AI agent, which then attacked hugging face, who in a twist of deliciousness, used an open source agent to defend themselves.

I’d joke and tell you to make sure that you haven’t left any open ports on your router, but if you’re here reading this I think probably you know better than that.

Less comically, there’s a weird intersection here between self-hosting, sovereignty and encroachment by big tech that is worth pay attention to.

It should certainly spur people on to seriously consider self-hosting as much of their infrastructure as they can (and securing it) if this is the preview of things to come.

Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.

I just wish I’d bought more SSDs.

  • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    15 hours ago

    What does self hosting look like in a world full of malicious AI agents?

    I’m thinking of this post/thread from Veronica explains, where she explains that her hosted services are accessible only locally because tbe security headache isn’t worth it: https://explains.social/@veronica/statuses/01KWJCGV27JVBHP21E2JNWDBFH

    As someone who doesn’t self-host but could and would want to, the state of AI has basically scared me off.

    • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      I am simpatico with her position.

      For what it’s worth, self-hosting doesn’t mean you need to be able to reach all your services off-site.

      LAN only access is perfectly valid and something that I prefer myself.

      Case in point -

      Last year I went to Japan for 5 weeks and rather than opening up dodgy ports to my home media services, I ended up taking a 128GB USB stick, my Chromecast and installing Nova Player.

      https://github.com/nova-video-player/aos-AVP

      Nova Player populates on device from your attached storage to create essentially a jellyfin like front-end. Install it, plug the chrome cast or whatever into HDMI on any TV and you’re off to the races.

      It’s wonderful and it’s actually now my primary streaming media source in the house; I just plug in my hard drive to my router, Nova sees it and my media sources are cross-populated to all of my Android devices.

      • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yea, this “data at the edge” approach, not “on the wire” Is interesting to me and makes sense.

        Basically regressing on the convenience/power of the internet because it just isn’t safe and easy anymore and for anything personal that isn’t a server -> many users, yoi basically ain’t gonna need it.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      This is a big reason I only remotely access my services via TailScale / Wireguard.

      Even if my highly restricted ISP let me open anything, I wouldn’t dare. I know for certain I don’t know as much as who/whatever is hunting for open ports out there. I have zero interest in instantly being assimilated into some botnet lol.

    • bdot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 hours ago

      yeah - i am now thinking i want to move away from anything that leaves me exposed. i have a few services that are nice to be able to access remotely, but it’s time to reconsider how much i actually NEED to access those services.

      • Dave.@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Consider only exposing a VPN service, like Wireguard.

        Then when you are away from home, it’s one tap / click to be back on your LAN again.

        • non_burglar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          You don’t even need to lift a finger. I use WG Tunnel, which turns on my VPN as soon as I leave my WiFi. I’m always tunneled or home.