For me, it was perhaps simple-scan, a very simple and efficient GUI to scan documents. I used it with my Brother printer / scanner and it works like a charm. Especially since I do not scan stuff often, so a program with more complex UI would have the effect that I forget how to use it until the next time.

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m pretty neutral about the mere existence of software I’m not interested in using.

    • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think MS assumes no one will use it. But having Linux builds of some of their software enhances their “MS loves Linux” marketing.

      Teams is another example.

        • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Fair – what I meant was more about the Teams binary kind of not being needed at all (you can use the web version without it). So having a Linux binary explicitly just seems a little weird, marketing aside.