I’m a solo dev and I got tired of not having a good iOS app to manage my self-hosted media stack, so I built one.

Quartermaster connects to Radarr, Sonarr, SABnzbd, NZBGet, qBittorrent, Jellyseerr, Overseerr, Jellyfin, Emby, Lidarr, Prowlarr and Bazarr. Manage your library, approve requests, watch your download queues, see active streams — from your phone.

The part I care about most: it’s pure client-side. No backend, no analytics, no accounts. Your server credentials are stored on-device in the iOS Secure Enclave and the app only ever talks to the servers you point it at. Nothing leaves your phone.

It’s in TestFlight beta now and I’m looking for testers — especially if you run qBittorrent or a less common setup. Free to test.

More detail and how to apply: https://qmstack.com/

Happy to answer anything about how it works.

    • swifty_lew@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Hey! Nope - this is not vibe coded - the app is not generic AI slop

      It is built as a 1st party Apple app

        • swifty_lew@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Yeah, I used AI to help build the site and write some of the copy, I’m a solo dev not a marketing team. The app itself is the part I’ve poured the work into. Fair cop on the site though

          • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I appreciate the candidness. Hopefully you can understand AI presentation generally implies an AI product, and without source code to audit, it raises some flags. Clarity of where AI is used as you’ve done here helps.

          • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            The public site is the first impression and introduction of a product, and this one has all sorts of slop signs around it. You can see how that can make someone skeptical to the quality of application. I don’t agree “computers can do it better” - I’d prefer a plain old website that gets to the point over one showing useless graphics, generated text, and non-functional interactions.