Techrights — Over 97% of the 'Linux' Foundation's Budget Goes Not to Linux
techrights.org

According to the latest annual report from the Linux Foundation (LF), less than 3% of its budgetary resources are allocated to the thing it is named after!

  • Jesus_666@lemmy.worldEnglish
    242·
    1 day ago

    You see, that’s just inaccurate. GNU/Linux is not equivalent to GNU+Linux. That would be addition; this is division. The bigger Linux gets, the smaller GNU/Linux becomes.

    That’s why they’ve developed GNU/Hurd. Hurd is unlikely to ever amount to much, meaning that GNU/Hurd will never evaluate to a small value. And that is cold, hard mathematical fact.

    • tabular@lemmy.worldEnglish
      5·
      1 day ago

      Hurd rescently became an option with Gentoo Linux (experimentally). Debian offers it too.

        • aliceitc@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          1·
          12 hours ago

          Not exactly true:

          Because the GNU kernel—Hurd—is not production-ready , GNU is usually used with the Linux kernel. There was an Arch-based distribution called Arch Hurd, which is inactive. Hurd package last update was in 2019.

          Arch Linux is such a GNU/Linux distribution, using GNU software such as the Bash shell, the GNU core utilities —coreutils, the GNU toolchain and numerous other utilities and libraries.

          Source: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/GNU

    • RalfWausE_der_zwote@feddit.org
      1·
      1 day ago

      GNU/Hurd will rise as soon as the abusers of that penguin abomination will realise they have been tricked by big tech. The free future is Gnu/Hurd and 9Front.