I have been using Arch for five years and I think I would like to call myself at least a progressive beginner when it comes to Linux, computers and networking, to be humble. 🤣

I would like to “move on” to Gentoo or LFS to force myself to learn more[1]. Please share your pros and cons for switching to any one of these approaches.

Use case: a gaming rig (using nvidia’s proprietary drivers and an AMD CPU) on one system and a server on a separate system.


  1. This was my main incentive for switching to Arch a long time ago, and it worked! ↩︎

  • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Second NixOS. I’m curious as to whether Gentoo does much that NixOS doesn’t do, aside from not using systemd and not having a world-readable store.

    • OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I believe nixos is superior. Especially on the package manager side. NixOS supports almost all packages for linux and far surpasses even the AUR on arch Linux.

    • Liketearsinrain@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      You can use systemd with Gentoo. it’s more customizable and has a better package manager (imo) and better documentation. For regular desktop use I think NixOS makes more sense, even if I detest the language.

      More customizable isn’t necessarily better if you have no goals in mind, either way.

      I run neither on my “main” machine.