They’re basically minimum-viable products that by design can be used to violate the law in California when the Act goes into effect on Jan. 1, 2027.

  • org@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    Except you’re on the “Alex jones” side here. You just can’t see because you’re a fed simp.

      • org@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        StAtE gOvErNmEnT sImP

        Just a magat by a different name.

            • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              Just so I got this straight I’m a Fed simping magat, because I think you’re being hysterical about a Californian law that doesn’t require verification and returns a locally stored unverified age?

              I’m honestly kind of neutral on the law but the hysteria around it as a slippery nipple to completely different laws is ridiculous.

              • org@lemmy.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                No I think you are based on your comment history and your support for privacy violations.

                • MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 hours ago

                  I just checked their account briefly and I’m pretty sure they are not MAGA.

                  Maybe they’re just… wrong? Hanlon’s Razor and all.

                  Note to self: Do not use touchscreen after applying hand cream