• floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Pipewire is sick, I love it.

    pipewire + Carla + LSP = easy, powerful DSP for both your inputs and outputs. Just a multiband compressor and parametric EQ do wonders for headphones and speakers

    • dhtseany@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Raysession is better than Carla, it’ll automatically content the connections for you.

      • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Thanks for the tip, I didn’t know of it, but if I’m not mistaken it doesn’t load LV2/VST3 natively? If I have my Carla session open it shows the plugins, but I can’t open their UIs, and I don’t see a way to add them if it’s not loaded. Plus it’s a JACK client, not Pipewire from what I can tell. So neat tool but not a 1:1 replacement :) I also don’t think automatic connections would work for me as some of my patches have sidechains.

        My biggest gripe with Carla was indeed that it holds the internal connections between plugins but doesn’t autoconnect applications, so whenever you change patches or pause your streaming client for more than 15s you need to tell it to connect again. So my current setup is one big “master patch” with several chains inside, that end in a 4-channel A/B switcher I use to change between the headphone and speaker chains for example, plus a simple bash script that loops forever (sleeping if everything is ok) and does some pw-link calls. It ended up being a lot less janky than I was expecting tbh :D (happy to share if anyone is interested)

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Pipewire can use vsts natively.

          I use an RNN noise plugin for background noise removal, it’s just a pipewire device that you can connect other sources through (using graphical wireplumber interfaces) or hard code specific inputs/outputs in the config.

          It’s probably a lot easier to use them in an application, but if you only need a few then this is a way to handle it without needing additional software.

  • Tiuku@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Packet loss concealment sounds hilarious without context :D

    What’s even the point of TCP? Just use UDP with PLC!